TEXAS & PACIFIC RY. CO. v. ROSBOROUGH

No. 357.

235 U.S. 429 (1914)

TEXAS & PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. ROSBOROUGH.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided December 14, 1914.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. F.H. Prendergast, with whom Mr. W.L. Hall was on the brief, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. S.P. Jones, with whom Mr. William Thompson and Mr. J.S. Patterson were on the brief, for defendants in error.


Memorandum opinion by MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS, by direction of the court.

This cause was removed from the state court to the District Court and comes here solely because plaintiff in error is incorporated under an act of Congress. We go no further than to inquire whether there is plain error. Chicago Junction Ry. v. King, 222 U.S. 222, 224; Texas & Pacific Railway v. Howell, 224 U.S. 577...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases