EUBANK v. RICHMOND

No. 48.

226 U.S. 137 (1912)

EUBANK v. CITY OF RICHMOND.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided December 2, 1912.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. S.S.P. Patteson for plaintiff in error.

Mr. H.R. Pollard for defendant in error.


MR. JUSTICE McKENNA delivered the opinion of the court.

In error to review a judgment of the Hustings Court of the city of Richmond affirming a judgment of the Police Court of the city imposing a fine of $25.00 on plaintiff in error for alleged violation of an ordinance of the city fixing a building line. The judgment was affirmed by the Supreme Court of the State. 110 Virginia, 749.

Plaintiff in error attacks the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases