INTERSTATE COM. COMM. v. DIFFENBAUGH

Nos. 285, 286, 287.

222 U.S. 42 (1911)

INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION v. DIFFENBAUGH. INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION v. F.H. PEAVEY & COMPANY. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. SAME.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided November 13, 1911.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. P.J. Farrell and The Solicitor General, for appellant in Nos. 285 and 286.

Mr. Maxwell Evarts, with whom Mr. F.C. Dillard and Mr. Henry W. Clark were on the brief, for appellant in No. 287.

Mr. Frank Hagerman and Mr. John Barton Payne, with whom Mr. M.B. Koon was on the brief, for appellees.

Mr. Robert Dunlap and Mr. Gardiner Lathrop, by leave of court, filed a brief for The Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company.


MR. JUSTICE HOLMES delivered the opinion of the court.

These are appeals from injunctions issued upon bills brought by the appellees against the enforcement of two orders made by the Interstate Commerce Commission. 176 Fed. Rep. 409. The stages by which the Commission came to its present conclusion, against its earlier view, will be found reported in 10 I.C.C. Rep. 309, 12 id. 85, 14 id. 315. See 14 id. 317, 510, 551. In the Circuit Court these...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases