WORCESTER v. STREET RAILWAY CO.

Nos. 144, 145, 146, 147 and 148.

196 U.S. 539 (1905)

CITY OF WORCESTER v. WORCESTER CONSOLIDATED STREET RAILWAY COMPANY. SAME v. SAME. SAME ET AL. v. SAME. SAME ET AL. v. SAME. SAME v. SAME.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided February 20, 1905.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Arthur P. Rugg, with whom Mr. John R. Thayer was on the brief, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Bentley W. Warren for defendant in error.


MR. JUSTICE PECKHAM, after making the foregoing statement of facts, delivered the opinion of the court.

The defendant in error makes no objection to the form in which the question to be decided comes before us. Whether one or the other action or proceeding is proper and appropriate need not, therefore, be considered.

The contention on the part of the plaintiff in error is...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases