UTERMEHLE v. NORMENT

No. 63.

197 U.S. 40 (1905)

UTERMEHLE v. NORMENT.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided February 20, 1905.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. D.W. Baker and Mr. Wilton J. Lambert for plaintiff in error.

Mr. A.S. Worthington, with whom Mr. T. Percy Woodward was on the brief, for defendants in error.


MR. JUSTICE PECKHAM, after making the foregoing statement, delivered the opinion of the court.

It is true that the plaintiff in error has received out of the estates of his grandfather and grandmother only between the sum of $140,000 and $150,000, while an equal division of the estate of his grandfather, between himself and his aunts, would have given him a much larger sum. What was the reason, if any, for this discrimination...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases