MAESE v. HERMAN

No. 226.

183 U.S. 572 (1902)

MAESE v. HERMAN.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided January 6, 1902.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Fred. Beall and Mr. H.C. Burnett for appellants.

Mr. Assistant Attorney General Van Devanter for appellants.


MR. JUSTICE McKENNA, after making the above statement, delivered the opinion of the court.

The first and second grounds of demurrer are substantially the same, or depend upon the same arguments. Of the second ground the courts below took different views, the Supreme Court holding that the town of Las Vegas was not and the Court of Appeals holding that the town was a necessary party.

As stated in the bill, the act of July 22, 1854, in execution of the treaty...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases