1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 184 U.S.
  5. 184 U.S. 162 (1902)
 

HATFIELD v. KING

No. 221.

184 U.S. 162 (1902)

HATFIELD v. KING.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided February 24, 1902.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Holmes Conrad and Mr. Edward C. Lyon on behalf of interested parties, petitioners to dismiss the appeal.

Mr. Maynard F. Stiles opposing.

Mr. W.P. Hubbard, Mr. C.W. Campbell and Mr. John H. Holt filed a brief on behalf of intervenors.

Mr. Stuart Wood filed a brief on behalf of the State of West Virginia.

MR. JUSTICE BREWER, after making the above statement, delivered the opinion of the court.

It is contended by the appellants that the decree in the Circuit Court against them ought to be set aside because they have not had the hearing in that court to which they were entitled by law; that they were not served with process; that counsel unauthorized by them entered their appearance, and after having wrongfully entered their appearance failed to take the proper steps...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases