HASELTINE v. CENT. BK. OF SPRINGFIELD, (NO. 2)

No. 63.

183 U.S. 132 (1901)

HASELTINE v. CENTRAL BANK OF SPRINGFIELD, MISSOURI (NO. 2).

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided December 2, 1901.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. S.A. Haseltine and Mr. James Baker for plaintiffs in error.

Mr. John Ridout for defendant in error.


MR. JUSTICE BROWN delivered the opinion of the court.

The only question involved in this case is whether, in an action upon a note given to a national bank, the maker may set off usurious interest paid in cash upon renewals of such note, and of all others of which it was a consolidation.

In this case, defendants sought to show that they had paid to the plaintiff bank within two years prior to the execution of this note, upon other notes of which this...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases