1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 176 U.S.
  5. 176 U.S. 640 (1900)
 

HANCOCK NATIONAL BANK v. FARNUM

No. 89.

176 U.S. 640 (1900)

HANCOCK NATIONAL BANK v. FARNUM.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided March 12, 1900.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. William Reed Bigelow for plaintiff in error. Mr. H.J. Jaquith, Mr. William J. Cronin and Mr. John E. Conley were on his brief.

Mr. Walter F. Angell for defendant in error. Mr. Stephen O. Edwards, Mr. Seeber Edwards and Mr. Albert Gerald were on his brief.

MR. JUSTICE BREWER, after making the above statement, delivered the opinion of the court.

This case brings to our consideration the same constitutional and statutory provisions of the State of Kansas which were before us in Whitman v. Oxford National Bank, ante, 563. In that case we decided that a plaintiff, after the recovery of a judgment against a Kansas corporation in the courts of Kansas, and the return of an execution unsatisfied, could maintain...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases