THE BENITO ESTENGER

No. 192.

176 U.S. 568 (1900)

THE BENITO ESTENGER.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided March 5, 1900.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Harrington Putnam for claimant.

Mr. Assistant Attorney General Hoyt for the United States. Mr. Joseph K. McCammon and Mr. James H. Hayden, counsel for captors, were on his brief.

Mr. George A. King and Mr. William B. King filed a brief on behalf of captors.


MR. CHIEF JUSTICE FULLER, after stating the case, delivered the opinion of the court.

If the alleged transfer was colorable merely, and Messa was the owner of the vessel at the time of capture, did the District Court err in condemning the Benito Estenger as lawful prize as enemy property?

"Enemy property" is a technical phrase peculiar to prize courts, and depends upon principles of public policy as distinguished from the common law. The general rule is that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases