BALTIMORE & OHIO & c. RAILWAY v. VOIGT

No. 88.

176 U.S. 498 (1900)

BALTIMORE & OHIO SOUTHWESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. VOIGT.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided February 26, 1900.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Edward Colston for plaintiff in error. Mr. Judson Harmon, Mr. A.W. Goldsmith and Mr. George Hoadly, Jr., were on his brief.

Mr. Charles M. Cist for defendant in error. Mr. Edgar W. Cist was on his brief.


MR. JUSTICE SHIRAS, after stating the case, delivered the opinion of the court.

The question we are asked to answer is, whether William Voigt, the defendant in error, can avoid his agreement that the railroad company should not be responsible to him for injuries received while occupying an express car as a messenger, in the manner and circumstances heretofore stated, by invoking that principle of public policy which has been...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases