CHEMICAL BANK v. CITY BANK OF PORTAGE

No. 736.

160 U.S. 646 (1896)

CHEMICAL BANK v. CITY BANK OF PORTAGE.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided January 27, 1896.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Hiram T. Gilbert for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Daniel Kent Tenney and Mr. Samuel P. McConnell for defendant in error.


MR. CHIEF JUSTICE FULLER, after stating the case, delivered the opinion of the court.

We are of opinion that the Supreme Court of Illinois in rendering judgment denied no title, right, privilege, or immunity specially set up or claimed by defendant under the laws of the United States, and that this writ of error cannot be maintained.

The contention of plaintiff in error is that the state court decided "either, first, that the cashier, Braden, by virtue...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases