IN RE RICE, PETITIONER

No number.

155 U.S. 396 (1894)

In re RICE, Petitioner.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided December 17, 1894.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Nathan Bijur for petitioner.

Mr. Thomas Hart, Jr., and Mr. Samuel Dickson, opposing.


MR. CHIEF JUSTICE FULLER, after stating the case, delivered the opinion of the court.

Without discussing the various matters urged upon our attention by counsel for the petitioner, it is sufficient to say that we are of opinion that the leave asked for cannot be granted.

1. Where it appears that the court whose action is sought to be prohibited has clearly no jurisdiction of the cause originally, or of some collateral matter arising therein, a party who has...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED


OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases