1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 155 U.S.
  5. 155 U.S. 240 (1894)
 

MUSER v. MAGONE

No. 37.

155 U.S. 240 (1894)

MUSER v. MAGONE.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided December 3, 1894.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Edwin B. Smith, (with whom was Mr. Charles Curie on the brief,) for plaintiffs in error.

Mr. Assistant Attorney General Whitney for defendants in error.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE FULLER, after stating the case, delivered the opinion of the court.

The conclusiveness of the valuation of imported merchandise made by the designated officials, in the absence of fraud, is too thoroughly settled to admit of further discussion. Hilton v. Merritt, 110 U.S. 97; Auffmordt v. Hedden, 137 U.S. 310;

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases