1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 155 U.S.
  5. 155 U.S. 240 (1894)
 

MUSER v. MAGONE

No. 37.

155 U.S. 240 (1894)

MUSER v. MAGONE.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided December 3, 1894.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Edwin B. Smith, (with whom was Mr. Charles Curie on the brief,) for plaintiffs in error.

Mr. Assistant Attorney General Whitney for defendants in error.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE FULLER, after stating the case, delivered the opinion of the court.

The conclusiveness of the valuation of imported merchandise made by the designated officials, in the absence of fraud, is too thoroughly settled to admit of further discussion. Hilton v. Merritt, 110 U.S. 97; Auffmordt v. Hedden, 137 U.S. 310;

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED
OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases