SALTONSTALL v. BIRTWELL

No. 116.

150 U.S. 417 (1893)

SALTONSTALL v. BIRTWELL.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided December 4, 1893.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Assistant Attorney General Whitney for plaintiff in error.

Mr. William A. Maury and Mr. J.P. Tucker for defendant in error.


MR. CHIEF JUSTICE FULLER, after stating the case, delivered the opinion of the court.

We are of opinion that the facts set forth in the special findings are not sufficient to support the judgment. The findings do not show what the collector charged the plaintiff; nor sufficiently describe the articles imported; nor does it appear from the record under what provisions of the tariff act of March 3, 1883, 22 Stat. 488, c. 121, the parties claimed respectively. The opinion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases