SOUTH SPRING HILL GOLD MINING v. AMADOR MEDEAN GOLD MINING

No. 338.

145 U.S. 300 (1892)

SOUTH SPRING HILL GOLD MINING COMPANY v. AMADOR MEDEAN GOLD MINING COMPANY.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided May 16, 1892.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. George S. Boutwell for plaintiff in error.

No appearance for defendant in error.


MR. CHIEF JUSTICE FULLER delivered the opinion of the court.

This was an action brought by the Amador Medean Gold Mining Company against the South Spring Hill Gold Mining Company in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of California, where it was tried on an agreed statement of facts, and a judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff, to review which this writ of error was prosecuted. The opinion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases