>
Leagle.com Leagle.com Leagle.com
Sign in
 

PEOPLE v. CROSLEY

No. C073699.

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. TERRY LEE CROSLEY, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District, Shasta.

Filed October 14, 2014.


NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115

DUARTE, J.

A jury found defendant Terry Lee Crosley guilty of forcible rape, criminal threats, and corporal injury to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases

    B. & P. RAILROAD v. FIFTH | 137 U.S. 568 (1891) | 37us5681639 | Leagle.com
     

    B. & P. RAILROAD v. FIFTH BAPTIST CHURCH

    Nos. 121, 122.

    137 U.S. 568 (1891)

    BALTIMORE AND POTOMAC RAILROAD COMPANY v. FIFTH BAPTIST CHURCH. SAME v. SAME.

    Supreme Court of United States.

    Decided January 5, 1891.


    Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

    Mr. Enoch Totten for plaintiff in error.

    Mr. J.J. Darlington and Mr. Martin F. Morris (with whom was Mr. G.E. Hamilton on the brief) for defendant in error.


    MR. JUSTICE GRAY delivered the opinion of the court.

    These two actions are in the nature of actions on the case for the continuance of a nuisance to the plaintiff's use and enjoyment of its house of public worship, by the noise, smoke, cinders, ashes and vapors from the defendant's adjoining engine house, repair shop and locomotive engines, and by the obstruction of access to the plaintiff's building by the defendant's unlawful...

    Let's get started

    Leagle.com

    Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
    Sign on now to see your case.
    Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

    • Updated daily.
    • Uncompromising quality.
    • Complete, Accurate, Current.

    Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

    Cited Cases

    • No Cases Found

    Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

    Citing Cases