CENTRAL TRANSP. CO. v. PULLMAN'S PALACE CAR CO.

No. 379.

139 U.S. 24 (1891)

CENTRAL TRANSPORTATION COMPANY v. PULLMAN'S PALACE CAR COMPANY.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided March 2, 1891.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. John G. Johnson for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Edward S. Isham and Mr. Wayne MacVeagh for defendant in error.


MR. JUSTICE GRAY, after stating the case as above, delivered the opinion of the court.

The principal defence in this case, duly made by the defendant, by formal plea, as well as by objection to the plaintiff's evidence, and sustained by the Circuit Court, was that the indenture of lease sued on was void in law, because beyond the powers of each of the corporations by and between whom it was made.

There is a preliminary...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED


OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases