1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 133 U.S.
  5. 133 U.S. 65 (1890)
 

SAN FRANCISCO v. ITSELL

No. 1506.

133 U.S. 65 (1890)

SAN FRANCISCO CITY AND COUNTY v. ITSELL.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided January 20, 1890.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. John L. Love, Mr. George Flournoy and Mr. J.B. Mhoon, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Thomas D. Riordan, Mr. William Leviston and Mr. George Leviston, for defendants in error.

MR. JUSTICE GRAY, after stating the case as above, delivered the opinion of the court.

This court has no jurisdiction to review a judgment of the highest court of a State, unless a federal question has been, either in express terms or by necessary effect, decided by that court against the plaintiff in error. Rev. Stat. § 709; New Orleans Waterworks v. Louisiana Sugar Refining Co., 125 U.S. 18; De Saussure v...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases