AMY v. WATERTOWN. NO. 1

No. 196.

130 U.S. 301 (1889)

AMY v. WATERTOWN. (No. 1.)

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided April 8, 1889.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. George P. Miller for plaintiffs in error.

Mr. George W. Bird and Mr. Daniel Hall for defendant in error.


MR. JUSTICE BRADLEY delivered the opinion of the court.

The principal question in this case is, whether the defendant, the city of Watertown, was served with process in the suit so as to give the court below jurisdiction over it. In order to understand the bearing of the facts of the case, it will be necessary to give a brief abstract of the laws of Wisconsin which relate to it, and these are mostly to be found in the charter...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases