CLEVELAND ROLLING MILL v. RHODES


121 U.S. 255 (1887)

CLEVELAND ROLLING MILL v. RHODES.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided April 11, 1887.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. George F. Edmunds and Mr. William E. Cushing, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Enoch Totten, (with whom was Mr. J.M. Flower on the brief,) for defendants in error.


MR. JUSTICE GRAY, after stating the case as above reported, delivered the opinion of the court.

The original defendant duly pleaded, and has earnestly argued, that the plaintiffs did not perform their contract, in respect either to the nature of the thing furnished, or to its quantity, or to the time of delivery. The principal objections, each of which would require consideration if the decision of the case depended upon...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases