BOHALL v. DILLA


114 U.S. 47 (1885)

BOHALL v. DILLA.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided March 23, 1885.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. S.M. Buck and Mr. W.W. Cope for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Walter Van Dyke for defendant in error.


MR. JUSTICE FIELD, after making the foregoing statement, delivered the opinion of the court.

The system of pleading in civil cases in the courts of California permits an equitable defence to be set up in a special count, by way of cross-complaint, in the answer to an action for the possession of lands. The cross-complaint is in the nature of a bill in equity, and must contain its material allegations, disclosing a case which, if established, would entitle the defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases