MOORES v. NATIONAL BANK


104 U.S. 625 (____)

MOORES v. NATIONAL BANK.

Supreme Court of United States.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

The case was argued by Mr. Edward W. Kittredge and Mr. Alonzo Taft for the plaintiff in error, and by Mr. William M. Ramsey for the defendant in error.


MR. JUSTICE GRAY, after stating the case, delivered the opinion of the court.

The principal embarrassment in this case arises from the difficulty of ascertaining from the prolix and obscure record what was actually decided in the court below.

The decision of that court sustaining the demurrer to the plaintiff's first reply to the first ground of defence was based upon the position that the exception in the statute of limitations of Ohio in favor of a married...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED


OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases