IN RE JASMINE D.

No. A086822.

93 Cal.Rptr.2d 644 (2000)

78 Cal.App.4th 1339

In re JASMINE D., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. Alameda County Social Services Agency, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Tammy D. et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three.

Rehearing Denied April 11, 2000.

Review Denied June 14, 2000.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mara Carman, Alameda, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Appellant.

Richard E. Winnie, County Counsel in and for the County of Alameda;. Anthony E. Scarr, Deputy County Counsel, for Respondent.


PARRILLI, J.

Here we consider an issue that often arises when a juvenile dependency proceeding reaches the stage at which a permanent plan must be selected for an adoptable child. If a parent has maintained a good relationship with the child through visitation, is that a reason to select a plan less permanent than adoption? This court has interpreted a former statute governing permanency planning as requiring the juvenile...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases