UNITED STATES v. FIGUEROA

Nos. 366, 244, 245, Dockets 84-1178, 84-1204, 84-1205.

757 F.2d 466 (1985)

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Celestino FIGUEROA, a/k/a "El Indio", a/k/a "Charlie", Amado Lopez, a/k/a "La Sangre", Joseph Diaz, a/k/a "Joe", a/k/a "Frank", a/k/a "Pancino", Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Decided March 7, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald E. Nawi, New Rochelle, N.Y., for defendant-appellant Figueroa.

J. Jeffrey Weisenfeld, New York City (Goldberger & Dubin, New York City, of counsel), for defendants-appellants Diaz and Lopez.

Mary Lee Warren, Asst. U.S. Atty., S.D.N.Y., New York City (Benito Romano, Asst. U.S. Atty., Rudolph W. Giuliani, U.S. Atty., S.D.N.Y., New York City, of counsel), for appellee U.S.

Before FRIENDLY, PIERCE and PRATT, Circuit Judges.


PRATT, Circuit Judge:

Defendants appeal from judgments of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Robert J. Ward, Judge, convicting them of violating 21 U.S.C. § 846 upon conditional pleas of guilty. With the government's consent defendants preserved for appeal the wiretap issues of whether Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510-20 (1982) (Title III), is constitutional...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases