1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 82 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 82 Cal.Rptr.2d 44 (1999)
 

HALL v. HARKER

No. G020262.

82 Cal.Rptr.2d 44 (1999)

69 Cal.App.4th 836

R. Michael HALL et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. James G. HARKER, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three.

January 29, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

O'Brien Watters & Davis, Michael G. Watters and Janis H. Grattan, Santa Rosa, for Defendant and Appellant.

Chevalier, Allen & Lichman and Roger P. Freeman for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

OPINION

WALLIN, Acting P.J.

This action for malicious prosecution against James G. Harker, an attorney, presents the question whether alleged bias on the part of the trial judge towards attorneys in general and the defendant in particular requires reversal. We conclude it does.

Procedural History

Dudley Taylor, a real estate broker, lived in Paso Robles in 1985. In February 1986, he...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases