CASCADE HEALTH SOLUTIONS fka McKenzie-Willamette Hospital, an Oregon nonprofit corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
PEACEHEALTH, a Washington State nonprofit corporation, Defendant-Appellee, and
PacificSource Health Plans, Defendant,
Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon; Providence Health Plan; McKenzie-Willamette Regional Medical Center Associates, LLC, Defendant-Intervenors.
McKenzie-Willamette Hospital, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
PeaceHealth, a Washington State nonprofit corporation, Defendant-Appellant. and
PacificSource Health Plans, Defendant,
Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon; Providence Health Plan; McKenzie-Willamette Regional Medical Center Associates, LLC, Defendant-Intervenors.
McKenzie-Willamette Hospital, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
PeaceHealth, a Washington State nonprofit corporation, Defendant-Appellant,
McKenzie-Willamette Hospital, an Oregon nonprofit corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
PeaceHealth, Defendant-Appellee.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued and Submitted March 6, 2007.
Filed September 4, 2007.
Amended February 1, 2008.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
M. Laurence Popofsky, Heather N. Leal, and Adam J. Gromfm, Heller Ehrman LLP, San Francisco, California, James H. Sneed and Linda M. Holleran, McDermott, Will & Emery, Washington, DC, Peter H. Glade, Markowitz, Herbold, Glade & Mehihaf, P.C., Portland, Oregon, for defendant-appellant and cross-appellee PeaceHealth.
Thomas M. Triplett, Kelly T. Hagan, William B. Crow, Nancy M. Erfie, and Michael T. Garone, Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt, P.C., Portland, Oregon, Laurence E. Thorp, Thorp, Purdy, Jewett, Urness & Wilkinson, P.C., Springfield, Oregon; for plaintiff-appellee and cross-appellant Cascade Health Solutions.
Jerrold J. Ganzfried, James F. Rill, Scott E. Flick, and Thomas J. Dillickrath, Howrey LLP, Washington, DC, John Thorne and Paul J. Larkin, Jr., Verizon Communications, Inc., Arlington, Virginia, Douglas S. Grandstaff, Caterpillar, Inc., Peoria, Illinois, for amid curiae Verizon Communications Inc. and Caterpillar Inc.
Aidan Synnott, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, New York, New York, for amici curiae law professors Daniel A. Crane, Thomas A. Lambert, Thomas D. Morgan, D. Daniel Sokol, and Richard C. Squire.
Michael Barnes, Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal LLP, San Francisco, California, for amicus curiae Catholic Healthcare Association of the United States.
Craig E. Stewart and Brian M. Hoffstadt, Jones Day, San Francisco, California, Sharon Douglass Mayo, Arnold & Porter LLP, San Francisco, California, for amid curiae Pacific Bell Telephone Co. and Visa U.S.A. Inc.
David T. McDonald, Kirkpatrick & Lockhart Preston Gates Ellis LLP, Seattle, Washington, for amicus curiae Microsoft Corp.
Thomas H. Tongue, Brian R. Talcott, and David P. Rossmiller, Dunn Carney Allen Higgins & Tongue, LLP, Portland, Oregon, for midis curiae Pacific Source Health Plans.
Michael E. Kipling, Kipling Law Group PLLC, Seattle, Washington, for amicus curiae. Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon.
Jonathan M. Jacobson, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati Professional Corporation, New York, New York, Scott A. Sher, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati Professional Corporation, Washington, DC, Deborah L. Galvin, Kraft Foods, Inc., Northfield, Illinois, Brian R. Henry, The Coca-Cola Company, Atlanta, Georgia, Debra A. Valentine, United Technologies Corp., Hartford, Connecticut, for amici curiae Genentech, Inc., Honeywell International Inc., Kimberly-Clark Corp., Kraft Foods, Inc., The Coca-Cola Company, and United Technologies. Corp.
Thomas A. Miller, Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi L.L.P., Los Angeles, California, K. Craig Wildfang and Andrew M. Kepper, Robins Kaplan Miller & Ciresi L.L.P., Minneapolis, Minnesota, David A. Balto, Washington, DC, for amici curiae American Antitrust Institute, Consumer Federation of America, and Consumers Union.
Before: RONALD M. GOULD, RICHARD A. PAEZ, and JOHNNIE B. RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
ORDER AMENDING OPINION AND AMENDED OPINION
ORDER
In a separate order filed concurrently with this order, we certified a question on Oregon price discrimination law to the Oregon Supreme Court. Accordingly, the opinion filed on September 4, 2007 is AMENDED as follows.
First, the last paragraph before section "I," originally, 502 F.3d at 901:
We vacate the jury's verdict in favor of McKenzie on the attempted monopolization, price discrimination...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
