FOSTER v. PRESTON MILL CO.

No. 32630.

44 Wn.2d 440 (1954)

268 P.2d 645

B.W. FOSTER, Respondent, v. PRESTON MILL COMPANY, Appellant.

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department One.

March 19, 1954.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kahin, Carmody & Horswill and Pinckney M. Rohrback, for appellant.

John B. Speer, for respondent.


HAMLEY, J.

Blasting operations conducted by Preston Mill Company frightened mother mink owned by B.W. Foster, and caused the mink to kill their kittens. Foster brought this action against the company to recover damages. His second amended complaint, upon which the case was tried, sets forth a cause of action on the theory of absolute liability, and, in the alternative, a cause of action on the theory of nuisance.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases