1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 64 A.3d
  5. 64 A.3d 579 (2013)
 

DEPOLINK COURT v. ROCHMAN

Docket No. A-4117-11T4

64 A.3d 579 (2013)

430 N.J. Super. 325

DEPOLINK COURT REPORTING & LITIGATION SUPPORT SERVICES, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. David S. ROCHMAN, Esq., Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J. Robert Morgan and Johnson, Morgan & White, Third-Party Defendants-Respondents.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 26, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David S. Rochman, Cherry Hill, appellant, argued the cause pro se.

Stephen H. Barrett argued the cause for respondents J. Robert Morgan and Johnson, Morgan & White (Mattleman, Weinroth & Miller, PC, attorneys; Mr. Barrett and Michael R. Mignogna , on the brief).

Before Judges SABATINO, FASCIALE and CARROLL.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

CARROLL, J.S.C. [temporarily assigned].

Defendant appeals from that portion of an April 2, 2012 order for summary judgment dismissing his third-party complaint alleging violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), 15 U.S.C.A. § 1692 to-1692o, the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act (CFA), N.J.S.A. 56:8-1 to-20, and common law fraud. We affirm.

I

The following facts derive...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases