CATCHPOLE v. BRANNON

Docket No. A062338.

36 Cal.App.4th 237 (1995)

42 Cal. Rptr.2d 440

MARIE CATCHPOLE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. RUDY BRANNON et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Two.

June 27, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Zigler & Ciesar, Robert A. Zigler, Karen G. Ciesar, Howard, Rice, Nemerovski, Canady, Falk & Rabkin, G. Charles Robb, Theresa M. Beiner and Annette L. Hurst for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Rudy Brannon, in pro. per., Mitchell, Dedekam & Angell and Paul A. Brisso for Defendants and Respondents.


OPINION

KLINE, P.J.

This case presents the unusual question whether the alleged gender bias of the trial judge requires us to set aside his judgment.

Appellant, Marie Catchpole, commenced this litigation in the Superior Court of Humboldt County, asserting claims of sexual harassment, assault and battery, and intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress against respondents, Melody and Jay Rane, owners of Eureka...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases