1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 343 F.3d
  5. 343 F.3d 1000 (2003)
 

GLEN HOLLY ENTERTAINMENT v. TEKTRONIX INC.

No. 01-56447.

343 F.3d 1000 (2003)

GLEN HOLLY ENTERTAINMENT INC., a California Corporation dba Digital Images, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TEKTRONIX INC., an Oregon Corporation; Avid Technology, Inc, a Delaware Corporation, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed September 9, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jeffrey T. Makoff, Makoffs LLP, San Francisco, California, for the Plaintiff-Appellant.

Stanley M. Gorinson, Kilpatrick Stockton LLP, Washington, DC, for the Defendants-Appellees.

James C. Burling, Hale & Dorr, LLP, Boston, Massachusetts, for the Defendants-Appellees.

Before: Stephen Reinhardt, Stephen S. Trott and Barry G. Silverman, Circuit Judges.

Argued and Submitted October 9, 2002 — Pasadena, California.

OPINION

TROTT, Circuit Judge.

Glen Holly Entertainment Inc. ("Digital Images") brought this private antitrust action, with supplemental state law claims, against Tektronix Inc. ("Tektronix") and Avid Technology, Inc. ("Avid"), collectively ("defendants"). Pursuant to defendants' Rule 12(b)(6) motion, the district court dismissed Digital Images' antitrust and promissory estoppel claims...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases