RIZZO v. KRETSCHMER

No. 7 March Term 1973, Docket No. 54,200.

389 Mich. 363 (1973)

207 N.W.2d 316

RIZZO v. KRETSCHMER

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided May 25, 1973.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lopatin, Miller, Binders & Freedman (Michael H. Feiler, of counsel), for plaintiffs.

Sullivan, Sullivan, Ranger & Ward, for defendant Kretschmer.

Baun & Barton, for defendant Astrolfi.

Plunkett, Cooney, Rutt & Peacock (by John A. Demoss and Sarah Wildgen Sweet), for defendant Plonka.


WILLIAMS, J.

There are three issues in this case. The first is what must a defendant, on a motion for summary judgment after original pleadings, interrogatories and depositions but before trial testimony, prove to prevent a case from going to trial. The second is what data at this stage of the proceedings may enter in the proof of whether there was a "genuine issue as to any material fact" under GCR 1963, 117.2(3) and GCR...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases