IN RE ZETH S.

No. S099557.

2 Cal.Rptr.3d 683 (2003)

73 P.3d 541

31 Cal.4th 396

In re ZETH S., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. Orange County Social Services Agency, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Stacy S., Defendant and Appellant.

Supreme Court of California.

August 4, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rich Pfeiffer, Tustin, and Jennifer Mack, under appointments by the Supreme Court, for Defendant and Appellant.

Laurence M. Watson and Benjamin P. deMayo, County Counsel, Robert G. Overby, Julie J. Agin, Deborah M. Gmeiner and Rachel M. Bavis, Deputy County Counsel, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Law Office of Harold LaFlamme, Craig E. Arthur and Karen Cianfrani, Orange, for Dependency Children in the County of Orange and Trial Attorneys for Zeth S. as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Respondent.

John J. Sansone, County Counsel (San Diego), Susan Strom, Chief Deputy County Counsel, Gary C. Seiser, Deputy County Counsel; and Ruth Sorensen, Alturas, for California State Association of Counties and County of San Diego as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Respondent.

Melissa A. Chaitin, Los Angeles, under appointment by the Supreme Court, for Minor.

William Wesley Patton, Costa Mesa, for Whittier Law School Legal Policy Clinic as Amicus Curiae.

Robert C. Fellmeth; Shannan Wilber, San Francisco; Janet G. Sherwood, Corte Madera, and Donna Furth, San Francisco, for Children's Advocacy Institute of the University of San Diego School of Law, Legal Services for Children and the Northern California Association of Counsel for Children as Amici Curiae.

Kenneth P. Sherman, Lisa E. Mandel and Anne E. Fraggasso for Dependency Court Legal Services, Inc., as Amicus Curiae.


BAXTER, J.

In a juvenile dependency appeal from an order terminating parental rights, may the Court of Appeal receive and consider post-judgment evidence that was never before the juvenile court, and rely on such evidence outside the record on appeal to reverse the judgment? The general answer is no, although in the rare and compelling case an exception may be warranted. In this case the Court of Appeal erred in receiving...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases