1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 2 Cal.App.4th
  5. 2 Cal.App.4th 1407 (1992)
 

SHOEMAKER v. MYERS

Docket No. C000150.

2 Cal.App.4th 1407 (1992)

4 Cal. Rptr.2d 203

JACK SHOEMAKER, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. BEVERLEE A. MYERS, as Director, etc., et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

January 28, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Christopher D. Burdick, Gary M. Messing, Cathleen A. Williams, Rockne A. Lucia, Carroll, Burdick & McDonough and John True for Plaintiff and Appellant.

John K. Van de Kamp and Daniel E. Lungren, Attorneys General, Robert Mukai, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Charlton B. Holland III, Assistant Attorney General, Dennis Eckhart, Elisabeth C. Brandt, Eileen Gray and Joseph O. Egan, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendants and Respondents.

McCutchen, Doyle, Brown & Enersen, Jonathan H. Sakol and Emily G. Caplan as Amici Curiae for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

PUGLIA, P.J.

This appeal is before us for the second time, this time on remand from the Supreme Court. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 29.4.) The matter originally came to us on appeal from a judgment of dismissal following the sustaining of demurrers to plaintiff's complaint. In our first opinion (Shoemaker v. Myers (Cal. App.) (Shoemaker I)) we concluded all...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases