1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. SCHOLZ v. BOSTON HERALD, INC.
 

SCHOLZ v. BOSTON HERALD, INC.

No. B231944.

DONALD THOMAS SCHOLZ, Plaintiff, v. BOSTON HERALD, INC., Defendant and Respondent, MILLER, KAPLAN, ARASE & CO., Objector and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One.

Filed June 21, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi, Mark D. Passin and Rex D. Glensy for Objector and Appellant.

Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, Harvey I. Saferstein , Nada I. Shamonki , and Joseph D. Lipchitz for Defendant and Respondent.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

CHANEY, J.

Miller, Kaplan, Arase & Co. (Miller Kaplan) appeals from a $4,500 sanctions order in a discovery dispute originating in Massachusetts, contending the trial court violated its due process rights by failing to inform it what conduct or circumstances justified the imposition of sanctions. It also contends the sanctions order was substantively unsupported by California law. We agree with the first contention...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases