EAST RUTHERFORD v. PBA LOCAL 275.

A-24 September Term 2011, 068872

61 A.3d 941 (2013)

213 N.J. 190

BOROUGH OF EAST RUTHERFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EAST RUTHERFORD PBA LOCAL 275, Defendant-Respondent.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided March 19, 2013.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David F. Corrigan , Keyport, argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Corrigan, attorney; Mr. Corrigan and Bradley D. Tishman , on the brief).

Lauren P. Sandy , Hackensack, argued the cause for respondent (Loccke, Correia, Limsky & Bukosky, attorneys).

Steven W. Kleinman submitted a brief on behalf of amici curiae New Jersey State League of Municipalities and New Jersey Institute of Local Government Attorneys (Gregg F. Paster & Associates, attorneys).


Justice LaVECCHIA delivered the opinion of the Court.

In this appeal, the Court reviews a public-sector arbitration award. The subject matter of the grievance that led to the award concerns the provision of health benefits under a collectively bargained agreement (CBA) between the Borough of East Rutherford (Borough) and the East Rutherford Policemen's Benevolent Association, Local 275(PBA), effective for the period of January 1, 2005, through December 31, 2009. The...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases