LOEBER v. SPARGO

No. 08-4323-cv.

Ronald G. Loeber, et al., Plaintiffs, H. William Van Allen, Christopher Earl Strunk, John-Joseph Forjone, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Thomas J. Spargo, individually and as Justice of the NYS Supreme Court, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Filed August 27, 2010.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Christopher Earl Strunk, pro se, Brooklyn, NY, for Plaintiff-Appellant Strunk.

H. William Van Allen, pro se, Hurley, NY, for Plaintiff-Appellant Van Allen.

John-Joseph Forjone, pro se, Clarendon, NY, for Plaintiff-Appellant Forjone.

Andrew Cuomo, Attorney General of the State of New York; Denise A. Hartman, Assistant Solicitor General; Andrew B. Ayers, Assistant Solicitor General, Albany, NY, for State Defendants-Appellees.

Christopher C. Wang, Attorney; Mark L. Gross, Attorney; Thomas E. Perez, Assistant Attorney General; United States Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division, Washington, DC, for Federal Defendants-Appellees.

Fay Ng, Assistant Corporation Counsel; Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel; The City of New York, Law Department, New York, NY, for City Defendants-Appellees.

Todd D. Valentine, State of New York Board of Elections, Albany, NY, for Defendants-Appellees New York State Board of Elections and Kosinski.

No appearance, for Defendants-Appellees National Association of Secretaries of State and Ostego County Board of Elections. See Fed. R. App. P. 31(c).

Present: ROSEMARY S. POOLER, ROBERT D. SACK, REENA RAGGI, Circuit Judges.


SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment and order of the district court are AFFIRMED.

Plaintiffs-Appellants Strunk, Forjone, and Van Allen, proceeding pro se, appeal the district court's judgment dismissing their amended complaint alleging that a 2002 plan reapportioning and redistricting New York State's legislative districts was unconstitutional under the constitutions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases