LAW OFFICES OF GILBERT & MARLOWE v. KURTZ

No. G042613.

LAW OFFICES OF GILBERT & MARLOWE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. SALLY FRANCES KURTZ, Defendant and Respondent. RICHARD C. GILBERT et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. SALLY FRANCES KURTZ, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three.

Filed July 13, 2010.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Offices of Gilbert & Marlowe and Richard C. Gilbert for Plaintiff and Appellant and Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Rynn & Janowsky, Elise C. O'Brien and Lewis P. Janowsky for Defendant and Respondent.


NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

OPINION

SILLS, P. J.

In this case we affirm a money judgment based on an employment contract between an associate attorney and her law firm, the gravamen of which was that the law firm would pay the associate a commission of 50 percent of "any new business income received" by the firm attributable to the associate independent of the firm's advertising. We affirm because the judgment is limited to awarding...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases