1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. BURG v. BURG
 

BURG v. BURG

Nos. A-0956-10T1, A-2387-10T1

STEVEN BURG, Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Respondent, v. ADELE BURG, Defendant-Respondent/Cross-Appellant. STEVEN BURG, Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Respondent, v. ADELE BURG, Defendant-Respondent/Cross-Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 12, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas D. Baldwin argued the cause for appellant/cross-respondent in A-0956-10 (Budd Larner, P.C., attorneys; Mr. Baldwin , on the briefs).

Howard A. Bachman argued the cause for appellant/cross-respondent in A-2387-10 (Goldstein and Bachman, P.A., attorneys; Mr. Bachman , of counsel and on the brief; David R. Cardamone , on the brief).

Allan Weinberg argued the cause for respondent/cross-appellant in A-0956-10 and A-2387-10.

Before Judges Payne, Simonelli and Hayden.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

PER CURIAM.

In these back-to-back appeals, which we consolidate for purposes of this opinion only, plaintiff Steven Burg appeals from three Family Part orders: (1) that part of the December 15, 2009 Family Part order, which denied a reduction in his alimony and child support payments for the years 2004 to 2006, granted an allegedly insufficient reduction for the years 2007 to 2009, and denied attorney's fees; (2) that part of the October...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases