1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 39 A.3d
  5. 39 A.3d 222 (2012)
 

HOLST-KNUDSEN v. MIKISCH

Docket No. A-3596-10T1

39 A.3d 222 (2012)

424 N.J. Super. 590

Heather HOLST-KNUDSEN f/k/a Heather Mikisch, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Erik MIKISCH, Defendant-Respondent.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 6, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark H. Sobel argued the cause for appellant (Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP, attorneys; Mr. Sobel , of counsel and on the brief; Dennis F. Feeney , Roseland, on the brief).

Erik Mikisch , respondent, argued the cause pro se.

Before Judges A.A. RODRÍGUEZ, ASHRAFI and FASCIALE.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

ASHRAFI, J.A.D.

Plaintiff Heather Holst-Knudsen appeals from a February 9, 2011 order denying in part her post-divorce motions and granting the cross-motion of defendant Erik Mikisch to reduce his child support payments. We affirm the order in part and reverse it in part. Because the trial court did not make sufficient findings of fact as to child support and the proposed change of the child's surname, and because...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases