WHITE v. STARBUCKS CORPORATION

No. A-3153-09T2.

KARI WHITE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STARBUCKS CORPORATION and JEFFREY PETERS, Defendants-Respondents.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 9, 2011.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jonathan I. Nirenberg argued the cause for appellant (Resnick & Nirenberg, P.C., attorneys; Mr. Nirenberg , on the brief).

David W. Garland argued the cause for respondents (Epstein Becker & Green, P.C., attorneys; Mr. Garland, of counsel; Mr. Garland and Jill Barbarino , on the brief).

Mark A. Saloman and John J. Sarno argued the cause for amicus curiae Employers Association of New Jersey (Proskauer Rose L.L.P., attorneys; Marvin M. Goldstein and Mr. Saloman, of counsel and on the brief; Mr. Sarno, on the brief).

Bennet D. Zurofsky , attorney for amicus curiae National Employment Lawyers Association/New Jersey.

Before Judges Fuentes, Ashrafi and Nugent.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff Kari White, a former district manager for defendant Starbucks Corporation, appeals from the judgment of the Law Division granting defendant's motion for summary judgment and dismissing her complaint brought under the Conscientious Employee Protection Act (CEPA), N.J.S.A. 34:19-1 to -14. The trial court found plaintiff failed to establish she engaged...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases