1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. RENNER v. AT&T
 

RENNER v. AT&T

No. A-2393-10T3.

JAMES P. RENNER, Petitioner-Respondent, v. AT&T, Respondent-Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 27, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Francis W. Worthington argued the cause for appellant (Worthington and Worthington, attorneys; Mr. Worthington , on the brief).

Patrick R. Caulfield argued the cause for respondent (Levinson Axelrod, P.A., attorneys; Mr. Caulfield , on the brief).

Before Judges Cuff and Fasciale.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

PER CURIAM.

Respondent, AT&T appeals from a January 11, 2011 order awarding dependency benefits to petitioner James Renner following his wife Cathleen's death from a pulmonary embolism. The workers' compensation judge determined that petitioner's claim is compensable under the standard governing cardiovascular injury or death, N.J.S.A. 34:15-7.2 (Section 7.2). We...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases