C.G.H., INC. v. NASH FINCH, INC.

No. A11-1598.

C.G.H., Inc., d/b/a Refrigerator Media Advertising, Appellant, v. Nash Finch, Inc., Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Filed April 2, 2012.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William J. George , Minnetonka, Minnesota; and Richard O. Bartz , Douglas C. Mezera , Bartz & Bartz, P.A., Edina, Minnesota, for appellant.

David M. Wilk , Larson King, LLP, St. Paul, Minnesota, for respondent.

Considered and decided by Stoneburner, Presiding Judge; Klaphake, Judge; and Cleary, Judge.


UNPUBLISHED OPINION

CLEARY, Judge.

Appellant C.G.H., Inc. challenges the district court's dismissal of its complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Appellant argues that the district court erred in ruling that appellant's breach-of-contract and violation-of-Minnesota's-Uniform-Trade-Secrets-Act claims are preempted by federal patent law. Because we hold that appellant's claims are preempted by federal patent law...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases