1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 809 N.W.2d
  5. 809 N.W.2d 96 (2012)
 

SUPREME COURT ATTY. DISC. BD. v. VAN GINKEL

No. 11-0886.

809 N.W.2d 96 (2012)

IOWA SUPREME COURT ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD, Complainant, v. James C. VAN GINKEL, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Iowa.

January 13, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles L. Harrington and Elizabeth E. Quinlan , Des Moines, for complainant.

Carlton G. Salmons , West Des Moines, for respondent.

APPEL, Justice.

This case shows once again how a respected member of the bar can become entangled in a web of ethical violations arising from the neglect of an estate in probate proceedings.

The Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board charged attorney James Van Ginkel with multiple violations of our disciplinary rules in connection with the probate and closing of the estate of John Oxley. The Board charged that Van Ginkel engaged in neglect in connection...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases