YOUNG v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
Civil Action No. DKC 08-2586.
United States District Court, D. Maryland.
August 9, 2011.
DeBORAH K. CHASANOW, District Judge.
Presently pending and ready for resolution in this employment discrimination matter is a motion for reconsideration (ECF No. 101) filed by Plaintiff Peggy Young. Because the issues have been fully briefed and no hearing is necessary, the court now rules. See Local Rule 105.6. For the reasons that follow, the motion for reconsideration will be denied.1 Plaintiff Peggy Young first filed this suit on October 3, 2008. Later that month, Young amended her complaint to assert claims against only Defendants United Parcel Service of America, Inc.3 and United Parcel Service, Inc. ("UPS"). (ECF No. 4). The amended complaint alleged violations of Title VII, the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 et seq. ("ADA"), and Section 1981. The claims largely concerned the treatment she allegedly received from UPS during the course of her pregnancy in late 2006 and early 2007.4
On July 31, 2010, UPS moved for summary judgment on all counts of the amended complaint. (ECF No. 60). After full briefing from the parties, including briefing that exceeded the standard page limits, UPS's motion was granted on February 14, 2011. (ECF Nos. 99, 100). Young moved on February 23, 2011 for partial reconsideration of that summary judgment order, contending that the earlier decision did not address one aspect of her ADA claim. (ECF No. 101). UPS opposed shortly thereafter; Young has also filed a reply. (ECF Nos. 104, 109).