1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 208 Cal.App.4th
  5. 208 Cal.App.4th 1381 (2012)
 

MULDROW v. SURREX SOLUTIONS CORP.

Nos. D057955, D058958.

208 Cal.App.4th 1381 (2012)

146 Cal. Rptr. 3d 447

TYRONE MULDROW et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. SURREX SOLUTIONS CORPORATION, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.

August 29, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hogue & Belong, Jeffrey Lee Hogue , Tyler J. Belong , Tony R. Skogen, Jr. ; Law Offices of John S. Addams , Niddrie, Fish & Addams, and John S. Addams for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Gibbs & Fuerst, Michael T. Gibbs and Kevin L. Borgen for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

AARON, J. —

I.

INTRODUCTION

In this appeal from a judgment after a bench trial, we consider two issues. First, we address whether the trial court erred in determining that an employer was not required to pay overtime wages (Lab. Code, § 510)1 to a class of its current and former employees because they were subject to the commissioned...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases