1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. SHUMAKE v. MIRISOLA
 

SHUMAKE v. MIRISOLA

No. B227383.

BRIAN SHUMAKE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. DANIEL MIRISOLA, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Two.

Filed March 5, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brian Shumake , in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Robert S. Gerstein ; Bernard R. Schwam , Jeffrey J. Doberman for Defendant and Respondent.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

BOREN, P.J.

An attorney has sued his former client in a dispute over fees. The attorney was limited to a quantum meruit recovery, because there was no written retainer agreement or contingent fee agreement. A jury awarded him $29,625. None of the attorney's challenges to the trial court's rulings have any merit, apart from his claim for costs as the prevailing party. We remand the case for a determination of costs...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases