1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 196 Cal.App.4th
  5. 196 Cal.App.4th 1043 (2011)
 

ARONSON v. ADVANCED CELL TECHNOLOGY

No. A129336.

196 Cal.App.4th 1043 (2011)

GARY D. ARONSON et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. ADVANCED CELL TECHNOLOGY, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Sixth District, Division Four.

June 21, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Elkins Kalt Weintraub Reuben Gartside , Jeffrey K. Riffer , Susan C. V. Jones , Eric J. Lorenzini ; Lafayette & Kumagai, Gary T. Lafayette and Rebecca K. Kimura for Defendant and Appellant.

herronlaw, Matthew V. Herron and Courtney L. Gregory for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

OPINION

SEPULVEDA, J.—

After respondents Gary D. Aronson and John S. Gorton voluntarily dismissed their breach-of-contract lawsuit against appellant Advanced Cell Technology (ACT), ACT filed a motion for attorney fees, which the trial court denied. Appellant argues that had the trial court employed the correct choice-of-law analysis, it would have awarded appellant its reasonable attorney fees as the party that prevailed in this action...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases