1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 179 F.3d
  5. 179 F.3d 725 (1999)
 

BAY AREA ADDICTION RESEARCH AND TREATMENT v. CITY OF ANTIOCH

No. 98-16612.

179 F.3d 725 (1999)

BAY AREA ADDICTION RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, INC.; California Detoxification Programs, Inc.; Ron Kletter, Ph.D.; Vicki Roe; Susan Coe; Rhonda Loe; Ray Doe; Oscar Voe; Cindy Moe; Robin Poe; Mary Foe, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF ANTIOCH, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided June 3, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Amitai Schwartz, Law Offices of Amitai Schwartz, San Francisco, California, for the plaintiffs-appellants.

Gary M. Lepper, Lepper, Schaefer, & Harrington, Walnut Creek, California, for the defendant-appellee.

Before: SNEED, TASHIMA, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

TASHIMA, Circuit Judge:

In 1998, Bay Area Addiction Research and Treatment, Inc. ("BAART") and California Detoxification Programs, Inc. ("CDP") tried to relocate their methadone clinic to the City of Antioch, California. After BAART and CDP received notice from Antioch that the proposed location could be used for such a clinic under Antioch's zoning plan, the Antioch City Council enacted an urgency ordinance prohibiting the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases