1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.2d
  4. 652 N.E.2d
  5. 652 N.E.2d 275 (1995)
 

BRIGHT v. DICKE

No. 77300.

652 N.E.2d 275 (1995)

166 Ill.2d 204

209 Ill.Dec. 735

Joan BRIGHT, Appellee, v. Faith DICKE et al. (Faith Dicke, Appellant).

Supreme Court of Illinois.

March 23, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eugene P. Daugherity, Myers, Daugherity, Berry and O'Conor, Ottawa, for appellant.

Hupp, Lanuti, Irion & Martin, P.C., Ottawa (George C. Hupp, Jr., of counsel), for appellee.

Justice HARRISON delivered the opinion of the court:

The issue in this case is whether a circuit court may permit a party to respond to a request for the admission of facts or the genuineness of documents once the 28-day time limit specified by Rule 216(c) (134 Ill.2d R. 216(c)) has expired. For the reasons that follow, we hold that the court may allow an untimely response where the delinquent party has shown good cause for the delay in accordance with Rule 183 (134...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases